Add Row
Add Element
Business Broker News
update
BUSINESS BROKER NEWS
cropper
update
Add Element
SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
February 06.2026
2 Minutes Read

FTC's Second Report Highlights Ongoing Battle Against Ransomware for Businesses

FTC logo and text on a blue background related to FTC ransomware report 2025.

FTC Reports Progress in the Ongoing Battle Against Ransomware

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken a significant step forward in its mission to combat ransomware and other cyberattacks with its latest report to Congress, mandated by the RANSOMWARE Act. Released in February 2026, the report outlines the agency’s continued efforts to strengthen data security and protect consumer interests.

Understanding Ransomware: A Growing Threat

Ransomware attacks have become increasingly prevalent, posing substantial risks to businesses and individual users alike. These nefarious schemes typically involve bad actors locking data or system access until a ransom is paid. The FTC’s 2025 report emphasizes the importance of preventing such attacks, particularly in light of ongoing threats from nations like China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran. With more than 90 successful enforcement actions taken against various cyber threats, the FTC is establishing a robust defense framework.

The FTC's Comprehensive Approach to Cybersecurity

The report highlights various initiatives undertaken by the FTC as part of its data security enforcement program. Key measures include:

  • Education Efforts: The FTC is actively educating the public and businesses on best practices for cybersecurity. This involves providing up-to-date information about malware, tech support scams, and how to effectively secure critical data.
  • Policy Enforcement: The FTC has successfully negotiated settlements with major companies like GoDaddy and Illuminate Education, thereby reinforcing the need for businesses to adopt stringent data protection measures.
  • Public Awareness Campaigns: By issuing alerts and guidance, the FTC is committed to ensuring that consumers are aware of the risks and the necessary precautions they can take to safeguard their information.

What This Means for Businesses Reeling from Cyberattacks

For business brokers and owners, understanding these developments is crucial. Staying informed about regulatory changes and operational guidelines can help companies navigate the challenges posed by cyber threats. The FTC’s emphasis on enforcing compliance and educating the public underscores the reality that businesses must take proactive steps to secure their systems.

The Path Forward: Continual Vigilance Required

As cyber threats evolve, so too must the strategies to combat them. The FTC's ongoing commitment to transparency and accountability ensures that businesses are not only held to standards of data protection but also remain informed on the landscape of cyber threats. Moving forward, collaboration among businesses, law enforcement, and regulatory agencies will be essential in creating a safer digital environment.

The FTC’s 2025 ransomware report is a vital resource for businesses seeking to enhance their cybersecurity measures. Emphasizing education, policy enforcement, and collaboration, the FTC is certainly paving the way for a more secure future.

Legal Updates

2 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
02.06.2026

FTC Refunds Nearly $23 Million: A Wakeup Call for Real Estate Investors

Update Justice Served: The FTC's Commitment to Consumer ProtectionThe Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is taking a significant stand in consumer protection by returning nearly $23 million to individuals defrauded by the deceptive Sanctuary Belize and Kanantik real estate schemes. This move not only highlights the FTC's ongoing efforts to combat fraud but also reinforces the importance of vigilance in real estate investments. A staggering 1,659 checks are being mailed to defrauded investors, rectifying a situation where the average consumer lost significantly due to false promises of luxury amenities and safe investments.Understanding the Scheme: Lessons from Sanctuary BelizeAt the heart of this controversy are shocking revelations about the Sanctuary Belize project, which was marketed as a luxurious coastal development in Belize. The reality was far from the extravagant visions painted by the sellers. As consumers were led to believe they were purchasing luxury estates, the actual development lacked essential amenities, and many investors were unable to resell their lots, significant losses ensued.A Legal Victory Against Multi-Million Dollar FraudIn a legal saga that began with a complaint filed in November 2018, Andris Pukke and associated defendants were charged with duping consumers out of over $100 million. Following a successful trial in 2020, the court ruled against the defendants, confirming the deceptive nature of their marketing. The repercussions for Pukke and his associates serve as a warning to both current and prospective real estate investors about the importance of thorough due diligence before investing in properties.Next Steps for Consumers: What to Do If You’re AffectedFor qualifying consumers receiving their refund checks—which average $16,462 for Sanctuary Belize investors and $6,346 for Kanantik investors—the FTC stresses the importance of cashing these checks within 60 days. This second wave of payments follows a previous distribution of approximately $10 million to Sanctuary Belize investors, showcasing the FTC's commitment to making whole those who were wronged.The Broader Implications: Why Consumers Must Stay InformedAs the FTC works tirelessly to reduce fraudulent practices in real estate, it's critical for both investors and brokers to stay informed about the legal landscape surrounding real estate transactions. Understanding consumer rights and the nature of marketing claims can safeguard future investments and enhance overall market integrity.Keeping abreast of developments like the FTC's actions not only provides essential knowledge but also empowers consumers to make informed decisions in investments. As a business broker, emphasizing transparency and integrity in all client dealings is crucial in promoting consumer trust.

02.04.2026

FTC Strike Against PBM Practices: What It Means for Drug Costs

Update Understanding the Landmark FTC Settlement with Express Scripts The recent settlement between the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Express Scripts marks a pivotal moment in healthcare regulation, particularly for American patients relying on insulin. The FTC's actions stem from concerns regarding the inflated pricing of insulin drugs—a trend that has burdened countless individuals needing affordable access to life-sustaining medications. The Impact of Pharmacy Benefit Managers Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) like Express Scripts play a crucial role in the prescription drug supply chain. However, the FTC's lawsuit alleges that their practices have led to artificially inflated prices for insulin and hindered access to cheaper alternatives. This settlement will mandate significant reforms in the way PBMs operate, aiming to shift the focus from profit-driven rebate structures to patient affordability. The changes, expected to drive down costs by up to $7 billion over a decade, are a crucial step toward promoting fair pricing structures. Transparency is Key One of the core findings of the FTC’s complaint is that PBMs have utilized complex rebate systems that obscure true drug costs from patients. As part of the settlement, Express Scripts will be required to increase transparency in pricing, ensuring that patients are not penalized with high out-of-pocket expenses based on inflated list prices. These practices have not only squeezed consumers but have also financially strained community pharmacies, which will benefit from the anticipated increase in revenue. Broader Implications for the Healthcare Landscape This landmark decision is significant for its broader implications. It underscores the FTC's commitment to holding powerful PBMs accountable and redirecting their focus towards patient welfare rather than profit margins. If effectively implemented, these changes may prompt other PBMs to reevaluate their pricing strategies, potentially reshaping how drugs are priced across the industry. Community Impact and Future Directions The settlement does not just promise savings for consumers; it aims to revitalize community pharmacies at a time when they are struggling in the wake of corporate competition. The projected influx in revenue to local pharmacies can help sustain their operations and enhance community access to medications, aligning with public health goals of accessibility and affordability. The FTC's actions, bolstered by the support from various stakeholders in the healthcare sector, illustrate a growing consensus on the need for reform in drug pricing. By focusing on transparency and accountability, this settlement aims to create a baseline standard that ensures patients are not financially burdened by the very medications designed to sustain their lives.

02.03.2026

FTC Intervenes in Sevita-BrightSpring Merger: Safeguarding Healthcare for Vulnerable Populations

Update The FTC's Bold Move for Healthcare Integrity In a significant turn of events, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has intervened in the proposed $835 million merger between Sevita Health and BrightSpring Health Services. This decisive action aims to protect the quality of care provided to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). The FTC's intervention mandates Sevita Health to divest over 100 of its healthcare facilities, specifically targeting the merger's anticompetitive aspects. Why The Merger Raised Red Flags The nature of the merger raised alarms primarily because it would effectively consolidate the two largest providers of community living services for vulnerable individuals in the U.S. By merging, Sevita and BrightSpring threatened to eliminate crucial competition, thereby degrading care quality and reducing options available to families. As noted by FTC Bureau of Competition Director Daniel Guarnera, maintaining competition within healthcare markets is essential to ensure that providers remain motivated to deliver high-quality services. The Implications of the Settlement Under the FTC's proposed consent order, Sevita is now required to divest 128 intermediate care facilities (ICFs) across Indiana, Louisiana, and Texas. This stipulation not only ensures that competition remains robust but also safeguards the dignity and well-being of individuals served by these facilities. The divested facilities will be acquired by Dungarvin Group, Inc., which has a reputation for effectively operating ICFs and expanding consumer choices. Reinforcing Commitment to Quality Care The FTC's action reflects a broader commitment to scrutinizing healthcare mergers closely, especially those impacting vulnerable populations. With the growing tendency for consolidation within the healthcare sector, this case serves as a precedent that emphasizes the importance of competitive practices in ensuring high standards of care and service availability. For business brokers and professionals in the healthcare sector, understanding the FTC's regulatory stance is vital. This case not only highlights the potential pitfalls of mergers but also points to a landscape where ongoing federal engagement can reshape market dynamics. Stay informed about similar cases as they can significantly affect future negotiations and valuations in the healthcare space.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*